The Durak Report January 16, Anno Domini 2026
1. The Durak Report January 16, Anno Domini 2026
First a sip to Scott. Thanks dude.
1.1. Trump's Warning Insurrection Act To Politicians Of Minnesota
Pretty self-explanatory, we shall see what happens.
1.2. Like Trump Not So Long Ago, India Tells Their Citizens That It's Time To Leave Iran
Another self-explanatory, but it's looking serious.
1.3. Ukraine Admits Manpower Crisis
Looks like Ukraine has a manpower shortage, but you know, be skeptical of data coming out of a war zone.
1.4. Ice Shoots Another, This time, In The Leg
Ice got ambushed, but they came out on top!
1.5. NPR Tries To Tell Us What To Do If Stopped By Law Enforcement
NPR is just bad. I'll summarize it for you. If pulled over, ask if you are free to go. That's about it. I just saved you 3 minutes.
1.6. NPR Writes About Trump's Insurrection Act Warning
NPR is nuts. Bias Bias Bias, little truth, Bias. See below.
1.7. The Race For The Arctic
"Trump’s outlandish threats to seize Greenland risk ushering in a new world order based on spheres of domination" As if that's not already the case.
2. Extra words nobody asked to read
2.1. Ice Shoots Another, This time, In The Leg
I wasn't going to expand on this one, but it's like a scene out of an action movie.
When performing a targeted traffic stop, their mark crashed into another vehicle, got out, fought ICE, two other men showed up and preceded to attack the police with pole arms. Crazy stuff.
NPR did a mostly fair take on the event, but they did fill it with fluff to make ICE look bad.
So what really happened, is that some dude tried to fight police, and two people from a nearby building showed up with a snow shovel and a broom handle. It's like some sort of peasant rebellion.
2.2. NPR Writes About Trump's Insurrection Act Warning
Oh, NPR, trying to link it up with Good again; Straw-manning what Trump said he wants to use it for. My oh my. It's for the violent protestors NPR (and hopefully the leaders of this mess), not law enforcement.
Want a quick summery if we ignore all the propaganda? The answer to the very question in the title? "Trump can deploy troops, and do some law enforcement." That's it. In that giant article, that's it.
Propaganda?
Well, they repeat the Renee Good and the ICE being ambushed stories for the first three paragraphs.
They say that it'll be challenged in court (Can this even be challenged in court?) Grok? "Yes Logen, it can be." Seems like a pretty risky way to fight off rebellions, but anyway….
They trash talk Trump's claim that nearly half of US presidents have used the act, then go on to admit it's 37%…. Sounds like "almost half" to me, but who am I? Not NPR, that's for sure.
They tell a story about a previous Insurrection Act. Cops once told marines to do something, the Marines did what they were asked to do, and everyone was horrified by the result. Probably a communications breakdown, but that's not the Marines fault.
Then the dumbest thing NPR says, "If Trump were to invoke the law to address crime or enforce immigration laws, it would represent a sharp departure from past uses"
And this is shortly after explaining how it was used to put down riots. Which is crime. Immigration mehbe, but that's crime too.
Heck, I'll just quote the article:
""" But that deployment also showed the risks of using military personnel as law enforcement. In an infamous moment, LA police officers asked a group of Marines to "cover" them as they approached a house. The Marines interpreted their request as asking them to open fire, while the police officers actually wanted them to stay on guard. """
Come on, what did they expect would happen? Say what you actually want, not in your own code words.
2.3. Thanks to everyone who reads my little posts here. May you all have a blessed day.
Subscribe via RSS https://durakreport.techshotgun.com/rss.xml